Equality.

[Crazyhorse]

Oh well. I seem to be talking to myself, but never mind.

Anyway, a post by equality on the panty wetting board has made me think.
I have to admit that I dont have the same sexual feelings when looking at a black woman, as a white one, but is this abnormal.

I grew up in an all white area in the 50s. I had never seen a black person in the flesh (so to speak) until the 70s, when I left home and lived in a student style flat/bedsit. The house next door was occupied by a black family who had 2 daughters in their late teens. They were very nice, but when they were sitting out in the back garden in skimpy summer dresses, they never attracted me as much as the equivalent white women would, mainly because a flash of black skin was so unusual to me.

Does that make me a racist? Was I discriminating due to colour? Or was it just a sexual preference that was not my fault? Or am I just ignorant for not appreciating the beauty of something I have no knowledge of?
Do black women find white men any more or less attractive than black men, and does it really matter?

But when people start demanding equality, how can they expect to have equality of sexual stimulation? I cant control what turns me on and what doesn't.

Does anyone else have a view on this?

[bspider]

Hi Crazyhorse,
I don't think you need worry overmuch. You might as well beat yourself up over preferring blondes to brunettes, or wet panties to dry ones! ;) Some ladies with different coloured skin turn me on,some don't, but I've been culturally conditioned to lighter skin. Of course, I was culturally conditioned not to wet myself ot enjoy others doing so, but I overcame that; I expect both of us would find the right lady a sexual turn on, regardless of skin colour!

Don't fret, just enjoy! :)

[Anonymous]

You got it right Crazyhorse. That person is completely wrong to accuse all of us of bieng racists. That is bieng judgemental and stereotyping people. That this type of thinking has infected or has been percieved as infecting a large part of the Democratic Party ,New York Times/Washington Post,college campuses is the very important reason Republicans get elected,the conservative talk show hosts flourish etc despite all the polls showing when it comes down to the issues people agree more with the Democrates.
Back to the topic yes I sexually prefer white women more then black but Pam Grier is as hot as any women then or now and one the great actresses to boot.

[Crazyhorse]

Thanks for your support Fillherup and Boris.

Although, I wonder if this idea of seperating the O/T is really working.
Judging by the response (or lack of) to attempts on here, I wonder if Skymouse might rethink the design of this part of the site.

[bspider]

Well, Some of us obviously look here! ;)

[Anonymous]

With all the complaining for months on end about how off topic stuff did not belong on the pee board it would be a shame if this does fail. Maybe this just needs some time or the correct topic. Still not sure if restarting the Iraq debate again is a good idea. I have thought about it but have just not had the time anyway. I am a slow typist and that subject requires careful thought. Be patient. The original pee board back almost 3 years now was quite slow at the beginning.

[WD12]

I guess this is about my fourth try at replying to the original post.

I just can't post anything I'm comfortable with.

Criticism of the models, in any form, is inappropriate here.

Praise for the models IS appropriate here. If one model gets more praise than another, well, that's the nature of the site.

Some of the ladies rock our boat, or "your boat" as it may be, some may not.

Accusations of racism are totally out of line.

[Crazyhorse]

I'm not trying to be negative, and I understand why Sky did what he did, and had I been in his position I would have done the same, as it is quite logical. One place for O/T, another for non-English posts etc. etc. but I just feel that some of the spirit of the old board has been lost.
I know it irritated at times, when serious subjects were sent off topic by some with strong views, (me included ), but maybe it was the only way of 'getting to know' the characters behind the names.

[bspider]

I don't really understand that, Crazyhorse. I can't see that any of the old 'spirit' ha been lost at all, unless you're multilingual - which I'm not.

As for the OT subforum - as was pointed out earlier, it's a bit moot if there's no posting in it. :(

Maybe with Mr. Bush's forthcoming visit we'll get some nice OT political debate going!

[bloom061604]

Praise for the models IS appropriate here. If one model gets more praise than another, well, that's the nature of the site.

Both praise and criticism should be appropriate on this and the panty wetting board in my opinion, as long as it focuses on the performance and doesn't become personal. All those who perform for a paying audience, be they models, actors, musicians, etc., should expect to be reviewed. Sometimes the reviews will be glowing, sometimes not, sometimes mixed.

I wonder if this OT board is just being overlooked. I admit I tend to forget it's here. Maybe Sky should promote it more prominently on the message board home page. This is my first post here. Now that I've broken the ice, I'll try to remember to check it every time I log onto the panty wetting board. People just have to discover it's a great place for wide-ranging, lively discussion.

--Bloom