PDA

View Full Version : David Trickles Christianity (re Oct. 18th)



Anonymous
Wed, 24 Oct 01, 3:36 AM
I am not really speaking for Trickles although it may appear that I am, that is not my intent...ok?

If you go back to Trickles and the first 'good bye' post you will see that Trickles clearly states that Trickles beleives that sex/fetishes/desires according to God's word should be between a husband and a wife.

No where in that post does Trickles make any remarks that this desire(topics on this board) are wrong according to God's word. In fact, I personally have not found any scripture that says that desperation, peeing etc is wrong according to God's word.

Now I know that you don't believe that there is a God, but I will quote and comment from your post. You posted first and I feel the need to respond.

'you remind me of some of the reasons that I don't believe. I can't believe in a God who makes people with various kinks and then makes them feel guilty if they respond to their nature'

First off, you know more about a living God then you want to admit. Second it is not a God that makes one feel guilty. It is the knowledge of right and wrong and doing the 'wrong' that causes our guilt, this doesn't matter if it was our dad that said no ball throwing in the house, and then we did, and broke something. GUILT IS GUILT put guilt in it's proper perspective.

'Yes, if there is a God he makes murderers and people whose kinks sexual make them want sex with children- again, to me this just illustrates that there is no God involved in such things'

God created us with a free will. God did not make murderers or child molesters. Adam and Eve started it don't blame God. Put the blame where it belongs. Regardless of that, the child molester has a free will, he has chosen to not follow God's word, but his own free will. So take it back two steps-say there is no God, we still have free will and we will still feel guilt. Regardless of how we got here.

'Over the years.....Christian attitude to sex is not so much 'pure' as an abuse of people's innermost feelings. Obviosly Christian views on these matters tend to vary a lot, but typically the idea is that sex is really only for procreation and that anything kinky or outside marriage is sinful'

Gee, if sex was not for pleasure assuming the rate of sexual acts vs actually conceiving do you realize how many children I would have. That is truely a false statement. God did give us the act of sexual intercourse as an act of pleasure, notice how close a woman feels towards you afterwards? God's only comment is not to refuse your partner unless they are in prayer...sorry girls no head aches...but, boy can I pray with a headache...only kidding...lol.

'thus they tell homosexual people that because they can't get married they should live celibate lives.'

No, that is not true, Christians will lead the homosexual to the Lord. I for one in a pentacostle church know of three homosexuals. What does the bible say, not to lay down with the same sex. Why does God tell us that....look at what happens to the homosexual...aids and other sexually transmitted yuck. Believing in creation by a living God, I know/believe that he knew that if two men/women were to be sexual together that he also knew the outcome. Let me tell ya it is very hard to watch a very good friend that you have had for life die of aids. I will not condemn the life style nor will I condone it. But, a very special person in my life died, a very nasty and wicked death. Just like in Leviticus how God laid forth all of the rules, they were a very dirty nation, he saw the disease. He warned them-same with the Homosexual. He warns us for our protection.

'Sometimes the very priests who tell them that have broken their own vows of celibacy by abusing kids in their church'

Sad fact but it does happen. Do you really believe that it is GOD making them do this? Can't you see that we have free will? Just like the person who sexually abused me. God did not say...hey fred .... molest her. It was free will.

'I think it is natural for people to feel somewhat coy about their sexual feelings and particularly about any kinks they may have, and that Christianity and some other religions play on that by making their followers feel guilt for the way they were made(wheher by God or otherwise). That way people concentrate on their terrible fallen nature and never get around to thinking 'Do I really believe this account of the world'.

What a powerful statement. I am in awe at how you put that into words. I bet many here can sense the feeling that you have portrayed. Ya know it even stumped me for a time. I was raised Lutheran, my hubby was raised catholic. We have gone to other denominations and now reside basically in the pentacostle religion. I do not have much knowledge on other religions though I do have some basic understanding. I do know that in the three mentioned above. I was never lead to believe that I was guilty other than the fact of sex before marriage. The comment that really throws me though is the comment 'That way people concentrate on their terrible fallen nature and never get around to thinking 'Do I really believe this account of the world?'. OOOH that is good. Almost by that comment I can pinpoint not only your age but also your religion. Go back my friend...it is not like that any longer.

'Yes, there ARE sins in this World, but they are such things as arms manufacture, a trade system which lets part of the world go hungry, using religion to make people hate each other, abusing kids, selling drugs- not the immoratlity of wetting for fun-get real!'

David you are so right, really! I do not believe though that 'using religion to make people hate each other' is correct. But, the just of that sentence I belive is correct. I don't believe that there is any thing wrong with the whole wetting/desperation etc subject in the Lords eyes. I really don't. I thought it was horrible, dirty you name it. But, within ones own personal life. With the man that I have married I think that it is ACCORDING TO GODS WORD.

God, My God, only wants for us to know him and be healthy and happy. What Trickles was trying to say -Remember I am not speaking for her- I think is that God places a very High Standard on marriage. It should be reserved only for the married couple, not shared. It sounds to me as if Trickles is not married and is looking forward to the day of marriage that the desires of the heart will be shared with that special person. And ya know what....God says many times in his word that he 'knows the desire of our heart'.

One more note here David. You impress me. More than you know. Go back and reread your post. 5 times you used the word 'god' in the correct way 'God', you also captialized Christianity. God does not think that this fetish is wrong. I am convinced of this. Lust is. People judging is. David you have been there...you know what I am talking about go back.

Now then I end my gospel hour....
love ya
T.

parkvilla
Wed, 24 Oct 01, 8:39 AM
I think I agree with most of that (even as a weak agnostic!) I'm of mixed descent- Roman Catholic, Church of England and Jewish! (what a mix of grandparents!). Mrs SPV is well educated in Islam too!

Whatever, we all share this place and would do well to share it fairly, with respect for each other and in peace.

Anonymous
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 3:16 AM
thank you tlili
i realize how hard it was for you to justify our fetish to yourself. and even though i profess to being an agnostic i can appreciate your views. that's one reason i'm an agnostic is becuase the major religious beliefs try to tell me that to get into heaven i have to do things their way. but nowhere in the bible can i find any reference to having to follow the beliefs of any one religiuos sect.

Anonymous
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 4:01 AM
My Friend, you have been such a help to me, and if only my hubby new that. But, in all reality, I am saddened by the fact that so many religions do-do that to people. Religion is so much more than what the contemporary religions say it is. Salvation, knowing the Lord is so very simple and so many people make too much out of it. That is why you, SPV, David, England and others are so offended by me. I cannot say enough how simple salvation is. I know how some people are afraid that they will have to change their whole life just to believe. But, in all reality it isn't like that. I would love to preach here, don't you know that, but, it really is not what some religions make it out to be, and I bet you are the same religion that David is. I am saddened by the fact that certain religions make people feel the way that at least three of you here feel. I know that you are married, I know that your wife enjoys your desire or at least wants to please you. All of this you have posted here. Why do you really still want to ignore Him? God does not say...'do not feel desperate', he does not say 'don't wet yourself, or another'. He is a loving God, and I 'BET' that you and David have grown up in a religion of fire and brimstone. I also would come to the conclusion that you two are about the same age...yes I know yours but I don't know Davids....in any event...he still had the upbringing that you did. Yes his guidelines and commandments are for our well being. But...he created us. God wants you and SPV, and David, England...etc. to enjoy your sexuallity, and more importantly, and I stress more importantly....your whole being. Think about this for just a second....I was saved at sixteen, I have known of a 'GOD' all of my life.

DID YA THINK???????

Now reflect...where did I start out here, where did I come from? This 'fetish' this 'desire' is not against Gods word. If I am ever convicted that it is I will come and share. But, it is not against Gods word. God does not want us to hide our inhibitions, he does not though want us to do things that are not healthy for us....ok?
By that I only mean that He(God) does not want us to do things that will hurt us. Think...there it is again....aids, and the sexually transmitted deseases. He doe not want to see his creation hurt. It is an unconditional love for you. It is free.

Enough babbling....I have a great love for all of you, I only want the best. Give "him" a new chance...ok


I can assure you that I would not be with my hubby if it was not of the Lord or if it was not enjoyable to some extent. Time, babysteps.


Love ya
T.

Hasen
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 4:07 AM
Tlili, I think that what you say is right, just not to many of us understnd it

DavidEngland99
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 5:54 AM
Hi Tlili,

I will keep this brief, because I know we will never really agree. First of all, I am not offended by anything you have written. However, because this is a sexual fetish board, I think the question about whether wet fun is a sin is an interesting one.

I used homosexuality as an example - I am completely heterosexual myself, although I know a few people who are not. As a 'straight' it is obvious to me that homosexual people are simply made a little differently. To me it is absurd to believe in a god who MADE people that way, only to forbid them to follow their inclinations. Instead, I believe that the men who wrote the bible simply wrote their own prejudices into it - just as others, such as St. Paul added theirs! I would guess that if these people had thought of wet fun they would probably have branded it 'voiding bodily fluids carnally' - or some such - and banned it as well.

As far as I am concerned, Christianity has exploited people's sexual impulses and kinks quite mercilessly over the centuries. I know a man who went to a Catholic school and he told me that the adolescent boys were regularly quized by the brothers as to whether they had masturbated. If anyone else tried this it would probably be called sexual abuse.

When Christians ask whether wet fun is a sin I think that it is obvious that they will never get a consistent answer. If you wrote to a variety of Christian thinkers across the denominations and asked that question (OK, that is a tough thing to try!) I would bet you would get a range of answers, including some who would feel it right to condemn it utterly.

I am afraid I try to use capital letters and punctuation in the conventional places to make what I write easier to read - please don't think that it has any deeper meaning.

Maybe the time has come to wind up the fascinating subject of the theology of pants wetting. Why not tell us all about your latest wet games. You are very lucky to be able to share wetting with your partner - I wish I could.

David

parkvilla
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 9:31 AM
Hi Tlili

Just for the record, I am not, and never have been in any way offended by ANYTHING you've said.

If anything, it's just the different ways UK and USA tend to express things.

Just keep on posting here!, OK?

LOL images/smiles/icon_cool.gif

parkvilla
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 9:33 AM
Anyway, who said god was a "he"? images/smiles/icon_cool.gif

Anonymous
Thu, 25 Oct 01, 7:22 PM
I'm a Christian and, for what it's worth, I don't think there is anything immoral about people enjoying what at the end of the day is only a natural function and part of our God-given nature. We all have to 'go' - and that includes everyone from the Queen downwards - so we might as well enjoy the experience.

Clearly activities which involve harming others (particularly young people) are wrong and are justifiably condemned by not only by Christians but by all fair minded and right thinking people. However, there is no reason why consenting adults should not enjoy pee (or poo) experiences and freely discuss such things if that's what they like. As part and parcel of this I think any forum touching on the lavatorial should be moderated, precisely to ensure that undesirable material is excluded whilst allowing a genuine freedom of expression between adults.

Anonymous
Fri, 26 Oct 01, 1:54 AM
One last comment:

SPV-do I not share freely, with respect? or in peace? I certainly don't mean to come across like that, if I have. And I am very glad that I have not offended you-in anyway.

Mr. David, I should take a lesson from you and keep it brief...lol. It is that women can never 'shut up' thing. And also just like SPV I am glad that I have not offended you. I do not think that ws is a sin. I have said that over and over. Sorry I read to much into your posts...just my nature. Just think how badly I drive my hubby nutts!! Gee...just think having to live with that sort of person.

I understood your use of homosexuality. Your comment 'To me it is absurd to believe in a god who MADE people that way, only to forbid them to follow their inclinations'....you are right we will never agree. Did you really read my post. It isn't so much what someone created, and then to tell them not to be that way. It is for the 'peoples' protection.

'I believe that the men who wrote the bible simply wrote their own prejudices into it - just as others, such as St. Paul added theirs! .......'
I sure am glad they didn't think of it back then .... aren't you...lol.

'exoploited people's sexual impulses....' I think that is a shame. It is very true. It also though is not all religions...and also dates a time in christianity and christian teaching. Fire and Brimstone....


'if you wrote to a variety of Christian thinkers across the denominations....' I DO NOT THINK THAT WATER SPORTS IS WRONG. You have put me on a mission....I will write to a variety of 'Christian thinkers'....I think ws is fine, I will try to prove myself wrong.

I think that your use of proper grammer and punctuation is honorable...sorry again for reading too much into it. Just me.

I am not the lucky one, so to speak, my hubby is!!
This whole subject once again I say is really quite a neat thing to be able to share with someone that I have given my heart and whole being with. I feel closer to my husband than I have ever dreamt possible. We have our issues, mainly me, but, I can not stand to be away from him. This ws issue has created a new closeness between us....at least for me.

t

parkvilla
Fri, 26 Oct 01, 10:02 AM
Tigerlilly...

I actually think that most of the problems here arise because of the different way in which Americans use the English language. We English say one thing, and you USA' ers interpret it to mean something else!

To give you a cracking example, I once remember telling a female work colleague from the States that I'd ring her. She was really cool thereafter and I didn't understand why, until belatedly she explained that in the States to "ring" someone means to marry them! To us it means to telephone, or "call" as you'd say!

All good fun eh?

Take care, lol

Anonymous
Sat, 27 Oct 01, 2:51 AM
David,

I wish to make a couple points about the Bible & public peeing. The Old Testiment (aka OT, Hebrew Bible, HB) mentions public peeing at least 4 times. While word-for-word translations come out something like "one who pees on a wall," recent translations use something like "a male" or "all males." It does not condemn the act. In fact it treats public peeing as universal. Males cover their privates by bellying up to a wall. Further, the Bible's source didn't feel men needed detailed public peeing instructions and offered women none at all that I know of. Women also had to do public pees while travelling. I find nothing to prevent a woman taking a path-side pause, so long as she kept her privates hidden.

Paul, as a Hebrew Bible scholar, was well aware of the HB's stance (oops) on public peeing. As an extensive traveller, Paul must have done more than a few pees-against-a-wall himself. Paul clearly knew about public peeing & just as clearly did not condemn it. What he certainly must have done is participate.

Our culture's attitude against public peeing comes from Victorian expectations, not from the much more permissive Bible.

Stanley