Model Search

[YellowDeluge]

Sorry to bother everyone with an inane post like this, but I'm hoping that someone can help me out.

The center model in today's collage on the WHP home page is absolutely gorgeous. Who is she, and if anyone knows, what set is that pic from?

I realize the collage changes daily, but I'm hoping that someone knowledgable will see the pic I mean and be able to answer before it changes.

If not, I've saved the image, but I'm unsure how to let others here see it so they might help.

Any help you guys could give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot.

YD!

[skymouse]

Hi YellowDeluge,

It looks like it has changed already, as it is now just a pair of legs!

Please could you email me the pic to skymouse@skymouse-productions.com , and I'll give you some more information.

SM

[~*~ k a t e ~*~]

I saw this earlier, but I also have no idea who it is.

He means this picture:

http://www.katykins.com/images/index2.jpg

[DavidEngland99]

Kate,

Unfortunately I can't see as much of you in your picture, but I lust for you more than that model:p

David

[~*~ k a t e ~*~]

I can't see as much of you in your picture, but I lust for you more than that model

If my face was as pretty as hers, I'd take over the world.

Incidentally, Skymouse, I noticed that there is no picture rotation on http://www.whp.tv, your mirror site...

[DavidEngland99]

LOL Kate,

I can't really judge that unless you send me a photograph of yourself ;)(but I'll bet you are being horribly unfair to yourself) - I know you are a readhead from some earlier pictures of yours (!!).

That model - whoever she is - could do with adding 10lb of weight and maybe even going to the gym a bit!

David

P.S. If you do manage to take over the world, do you promise to manage things better than Bush and Blair?

[skymouse]

The original photoset was justine-002, posted on February 24, 2003.

The original version of the photo, justine-002-06.jpg, is shown below, and you can see she looks rather different and she is nowhere near as thin! The reason is this: most of my photos have a 2:3 aspect ratio, but a few of them, including most of the ones from JTP (who produced the photoset of Justine) are in a 3:4 aspect ratio. When my software automatically generates the random images on the home page each day, it chooses three pics at random and makes a small version - in a 2:3 aspect ratio. When the original had a 3:4 aspect ratio, it gets squeezed to fit the new proportion. So poor old Justine looked like she'd gone through the mangle!

SM

[bspider]

I think I'd still prefer Kate... ;)

Boris.

[DavidEngland99]

Bspider,

I totally agree - I'd still opt of Kate! However I had to laugh that Justine had been software de-enhanced! Of course, maybe now YellowDeluge will no longer fancy her as much!

Please don't go down the route of software massaging your images, Sky otherwise we would have to call you Loengrin-Sky

David

[YellowDeluge]

First of all, an apology.

I've been on a couple times in the last few days, but haven't had time to reply. So, I'm sorry for seeming such an ingrate, but I'd like to thank everyone who tried to help or replied to the thread.

Unfortunately, as lovely as she is, Justine wasn't the model to whom I was referring. A million thanks to Kate for attempting to help, though (even if she did put poor Justine through the wringer first). :)

I'll send the pic to Skymouse, and, hopefully, he can enlighten me.

Again, thanks everyone (especially Sky and Kate) for your help.

YD!

[~*~ k a t e ~*~]

Darn, those pictures must rotate fast!